Abstract

With increasing life expectancy, knee pain has become more prevalent, highlighting the need for early prediction. Although X-rays are commonly used for diagnosis, knee pain and X-ray findings do not always match. This study aims to identify factors contributing to knee pain in individuals with both normal and abnormal knee X-ray results to bridge the gap between X-ray findings and knee pain. Data from the fifth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES), collected from 2010 to 2012, including data from 5,191 participants, were analyzed. The focus was on epidemiological characteristics, medical histories, knee pain, and X-ray grades. Multivariate logistic regression and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models were used to predict knee pain in individuals with normal and abnormal knee X-rays, categorized by Kellgren-Lawrence grades. For normal X-rays, the logistic regression model identified aging, being female, higher BMI, lower fat percentage, osteoporosis, depression, and rural living as factors associated with knee pain. The XGBoost model highlighted BMI, age, and sex as key predictors, with a feature importance >0.1. For abnormal X-rays, logistic regression indicated that aging, being female, higher BMI, osteoporosis, depression, and rural living were associated with knee pain. The XGBoost model highlighted age, BMI, sex, and osteoporosis as key predictors, with a feature importance >0.1. Aging and being female were associated with knee pain due to hormonal changes in women, as well as cartilage and bone deterioration. Lower fat percentage was significantly associated with increased pain, which might be attributable to higher activity levels. Higher BMI and osteoporosis were significantly associated with knee pain, possibly due to increased stress and reduced resistance on knee structures, respectively. Depression was identified as a key predictor of knee pain in patients with normal X-rays, potentially attributable to psychosomatic factors. The study's limitations include its cross-sectional nature, which does not allow for the establishment of causal relationships, the lack of detailed medical history such as trauma history, and recall bias due to self-reported questionnaires. Future research should address these limitations to support our hypothesis.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.