Factors associated with medical students' interest in remote and very remote practice in Australia: A national study.

Abstract

ObjectiveTo investigate the factors that are associated with medical student interest in remote and very remote practice in Australia.DesignAggregated data of an annual cross‐sectional survey from 2013 to 2017.SettingAustralia.ParticipantsMedical students from 17 medical schools, at the point of finishing one year of clinical training in a rural or remote location in Australia.Main outcome measuresIntention for working in a remote or very remote location as a doctor.ResultsResponses were analysed from 3328 medical students. From this cohort, 37.6%, 54.0% and 7.0% of students reported future career intent in capital or major cities; regional Australia; and remote or very remote Australia respectively. Multivariable analysis indicated students interested in remote and very remote practice compared to those interested in regional practice were more likely to be from a rural background, have prior generalist intentions, felt as though their rural clinical school (RCS) experience increased interest in remote and very remote practice, and had higher rural practice self‐efficacy. Odds ratios were larger for these factors when students interested in remote or very remote practice were compared with students interested in practicing in capital or major cities.ConclusionsRural background, prior generalist intentions, rural practice self‐efficacy and the overall influence of the RCS experience are associated with interest in remote and very remote practice.