Abstract

BackgroundNegative symptoms represent a core feature of schizophrenia. They have been associated to poor functional outcome, worse quality of life and poor response to pharmacological treatment. Several factor analytic studies have reported that negative symptoms can be divided into two domains referred to as Avolition-apathy which includes Avolition, Anhedonia and Asociality and the Expressive deficit domain, which includes Alogia and Blunted affect.Avolition-apathy has been associated to a dysfunction of brain circuits involved in motivation, in particular to those related to the ability to anticipate pleasure and learn from rewards. It is highly controversial whether Avolition-apathy and all subcomponent symptoms share the same neurobiological underpinnings.Our study, using brain electrical microstates (MS) which reflect global, subsecond patterns of functional connectivity, had two primary aims: 1) to identify differences between healthy controls (HC) and clinically stable people with schizophrenia (SCZ) in brain electrical microstate parameters and 2) to investigate the associations of the microstate parameters with the Avolition-apathy domain and its subcomponent symptoms.MethodsWe analyzed multichannel resting EEGs in 142 SCZ and in 64 HC, recruited within the add-on EEG study of the Italian Network for Research on Psychoses. The microstate analysis was performed using an in-house plugin for Brain Vision Analyzer. Based on the microstate map templates from a large normative study, each moment of the ongoing EEGs was assigned to one of four microstates (MS) classes (MS-A, MS-B, MS-C, MS-D). Microstates were then quantified in terms of relative time contribution, duration and occurrence. Negative symptoms were assessed using the Brief Negative Symptoms Scale (BNSS): Avolition-apathy was obteined by summing the scores on the subscales Anhedonia (consummatory and anticipatory anhedonia), Avolition and Asociality; Expressive deficit was computed by summing the scores on the subscales Blunted Affect and Alogia.Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test group differences on MS parameters. Pearson’s r coefficients were computed to investigate the correlations of MS parameters with the negative symptom domains and subcomponent symptoms.ResultsThere was no significant group difference in sex (p=0.073) and age (p=0.547) between SCZ and HC. SCZ, in comparison to HC, showed increased contribution (p=0.009) and duration (p=0.016) of MS-C.As regard to negative symptoms, the total score of the BNSS was positively correlated with the contribution of MS-A (r= 0.19, p<0.03). Avolition-apathy domain (r=0.22, p<0.01), anticipatory anhedonia (r=0.20, p=0.02), avolition (r=0.20, p=0.02) and asociality (r=0.25, p=0.003), but not consummatory anhedonia (r=0.13, p=0.13), were positively correlated with the contribution of MS-A. There was no correlation between Expressive deficit and MS-A parameters.DiscussionOur findings, in line with previous studies, showed an increased contribution of MS-C in SCZ. MS-C was not associated with clinical features, thus probably representing a trait marker of the disease. In addition, our results support different neurophysiological correlates of the two negative symptom domains and suggest that only anticipatory anhedonia, but not consummatory anhedonia, might be linked to the Avolition-apathy domain. These findings are in line with studies reporting an intact ability to experience in the moment pleasure and an impairment in pleasure anticipation (anticipatory anhedonia) in people with schizophrenia.

Highlights

  • Negative symptoms represent a core feature of schizophrenia

  • The present study aimed to examine the construct validity of BNSS, by using convergent and divergent validities as well as factor analysis, in a Brazilian sample of 111 outpatients diagnosed with schizophrenia by DSM-5

  • Patients were evaluated by the Brazilian version of the BNSS and positive and negative subscales of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Results: Assessment of patients by both instruments revealed an either an excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.938) or inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.92), as well as a strong correlation between BNSS and negative PANSS (r = 0.866) and a weak correlation of the instrument with the positive PANSS (r = 0.292) characterizing adequate convergent and discriminant validities, respectively

Read more

Summary

Methods

The present study aimed to examine the construct validity of BNSS, by using convergent and divergent validities as well as factor analysis, in a Brazilian sample of 111 outpatients diagnosed with schizophrenia by DSM-5. Patients were evaluated by the Brazilian version of the BNSS and positive and negative subscales of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Results: Assessment of patients by both instruments revealed an either an excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.938) or inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.92), as well as a strong correlation between BNSS and negative PANSS (r = 0.866) and a weak correlation of the instrument with the positive PANSS (r = 0.292) characterizing adequate convergent and discriminant validities, respectively. Discussion: The study shows that the Brazilian version of the BNSS has adequate psychometric properties and it is a reliable instrument for the assessment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia, either for clinical practice or research. Giulia Giordano*,1, Thomas Koenig, Armida Mucci, Annarita Vignapiano, Antonella Amodio, Giorgio Di Lorenzo, Cinzia Niolu, Mario Altamura, Antonello Bellomo, Silvana Galderisi1 1University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”; 2Translational Research Center, University Hospital of Psychiatry Bern; 3University of Rome Tor Vergata; 4University of Foggia

Background
Findings

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.