Abstract

ABSTRACT Question time during political press briefings presents one of the few occasions for the press to exercise its watchdog role. However, the way the press utilises this opportunity varies. Drawing on journalistic interview concept, which treats interviews between journalists and politicians as an “encounter of two institutions”, each making a claim on legitimacy, this qualitative study conducted a content analysis on 10 recorded political press briefings held between April 2019 and April 2020, a period dominated by many political press briefings on elections, to examine how Malawian journalists utilise question time during political press briefings. The analysis is complemented by interviews with 15 Malawian journalists. Findings show that although question time gives Malawian journalists an opportunity to exercise their watchdog role through asking questions, the occasion is in most cases abused by both parties in the interlocution. Furthermore, political interests, freebies and power disparity between press briefing organisers and journalists compromise the independence of the press and its watchdog role.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.