Abstract

Reconstruction of fine-scale information from sparse data is often needed in practical fluid dynamics where the sensors are typically sparse and yet, one may need to learn the underlying flow structures or inform predictions through assimilation into data-driven models. Given that sparse reconstruction is inherently an ill-posed problem, the most successful approaches encode the physics into an underlying sparse basis space that spans the manifold to generate well-posedness. To achieve this, one commonly uses a generic orthogonal Fourier basis or a data specific proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) basis to reconstruct from sparse sensor information at chosen locations. Such a reconstruction problem is well-posed as long as the sensor locations are incoherent and can sample the key physical mechanisms. The resulting inverse problem is easily solved using l 2 minimization or if necessary, sparsity promoting l 1 minimization. Given the proliferation of machine learning and the need for robust reconstruction frameworks in the face of dynamically evolving flows, we explore in this study the suitability of non-orthogonal basis obtained from extreme learning machine (ELM) auto-encoders for sparse reconstruction. In particular, we assess the interplay between sensor quantity and sensor placement in a given system dimension for accurate reconstruction of canonical fluid flows in comparison to POD-based reconstruction.

Highlights

  • Multiscale fluid flow phenomena are ubiquitous in engineering and geophysical settings.Depending on the situation, one encounters either a data-sparse or a data-rich problem

  • As part of an earlier effort [35], we explored how sensor quantity and placement, and the system dimensionality impact the accuracy of proper orthogonal decomposition (POD)-based sparse reconstructed field

  • We explore the interplay of sensor quantity (P) and placement, and system dimensionality or sparsity (K) using optimal data-driven POD & extreme learning machine (ELM) bases with an l2 sparse reconstruction (SR) of a cylinder wake flow

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Multiscale fluid flow phenomena are ubiquitous in engineering and geophysical settings. The magic of compressive sensing (CS) [10,11,12,13] is in its ability to overcome this constraint by seeking a solution that can be less sparse than the dimensionality of the chosen feature space using l1 -norm regularized least-squares reconstruction Such methods have been successfully applied in image processing using a Fourier or wavelet basis and to fundamental fluid flows [6,7,9,28,29,30]. For many common applications in image and signal processing, this optimal set exists in the form of wavelets and Fourier functions, but these may not be optimally sparse for fluid flow solutions to PDEs. the reason why data-driven bases such as POD/principal component analysis (PCA) [3,4] are popular.

The Sparse Reconstruction Problem
Sparse Reconstruction Theory
Data-Driven Sparse Basis Computation Using POD
Data-Driven Sparse Basis Computation Using an ELM Autoencoder
Sparse Recovery Framework
Algorithmic Complexity
Data Generation for Canonical Cylinder Wake
Sparse Reconstruction of Cylinder Wake Limit-Cycle Dynamics
Sparse Reconstruction Experiments and Analysis
Sparsity and Energy Metrics
Sparse Reconstruction Using the ELM Basis
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call