Abstract
Excerpts from the World Medical LiteratureJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada Vol. 39Issue 3PreviewSummary: A total of 1352 patients undergoing primary repair of pelvic organ prolapse were randomized to either traditional repair or repair with synthetic mesh or biological graft. The primary endpoint was patient-reported prolapse symptoms at up to two years and the secondary endpoint was quality of life. There was no significant difference between the groups in either endpoint, with the exception of a 12% incidence of mesh complications in the mesh group. Full-Text PDF
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Paper version not known
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
