Abstract
We present a new method to assess the information carried by temporal patterns in spike trains. The method first performs a wavelet decomposition of the spike trains, then uses Shannon information to select a subset of coefficients carrying information, and finally assesses timing information in terms of decoding performance: the ability to identify the presented stimuli from spike train patterns. We show that the method allows: 1) a robust assessment of the information carried by spike time patterns even when this is distributed across multiple time scales and time points; 2) an effective denoising of the raster plots that improves the estimate of stimulus tuning of spike trains; and 3) an assessment of the information carried by temporally coordinated spikes across neurons. Using simulated data, we demonstrate that the Wavelet-Information (WI) method performs better and is more robust to spike time-jitter, background noise, and sample size than well-established approaches, such as principal component analysis, direct estimates of information from digitized spike trains, or a metric-based method. Furthermore, when applied to real spike trains from monkey auditory cortex and from rat barrel cortex, the WI method allows extracting larger amounts of spike timing information. Importantly, the fact that the WI method incorporates multiple time scales makes it robust to the choice of partly arbitrary parameters such as temporal resolution, response window length, number of response features considered, and the number of available trials. These results highlight the potential of the proposed method for accurate and objective assessments of how spike timing encodes information.
Highlights
THE IMPORTANCE OF PRECISE spike timing in carrying meaningful information has attracted much attention (Quian Quiroga and Panzeri 2009; Rieke et al 1999)
By construction, the performance with the WI method clearly outperformed the one obtained with spike counts
The average performance obtained with the WI method was significantly better than that obtained with the MS method for all q-values
Summary
THE IMPORTANCE OF PRECISE spike timing in carrying meaningful information has attracted much attention (Quian Quiroga and Panzeri 2009; Rieke et al 1999). Does the temporal structure of spike trains provide information beyond the total spike count, or does it merely reflect noise? According to the “rate coding” view, neurons represent stimuli solely by the rate of firing within an encoding time window (Adrian and Zotterman 1926; Shadlen and Newsome 1994). According to the “temporal coding” view, the time structure of the responses
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.