Abstract
This investigation aimed to examine the source of Ca2+ mobilization that leads to the contractile response to either exogenously added histamine (1μM–1mM) or electrical field stimulation (10Hz, 0.5ms, 60V). Removal of extracellular Ca2+ by removal of Ca2+ from the bathing medium reduced histamine (1mM) induced responses by 34% and responses induced by electrical field stimulation by 94%. Similarly, blockade of L-type Ca2+ channels by nifedipine (1μM) reduced histamine (1mM) induced responses by 43% and responses induced by electrical field stimulation by 77%. Application of cyclopiazonic acid (CPA) (10μM) to inhibit Ca2+ reuptake to the sarcoplasmic reticulum enhanced both histamine-induced and electrical field stimulation induced responses to a small degree, while the addition of the inosotol triphosphate (IP3) receptor antagonist, 2-aminophenoxyethane borane (2-APB) (100μM) inhibited histamine induced responses by 70% and electrical field stimulation induced responses by 57%. Ryanodine (1μM) did not affect contractile responses to either histamine or electrical field stimulation, either in the absence or presence of 2-APB (100μM). During both histamine and electrical field stimulation induced contractions, prostate smooth muscle generates IP3 receptor mediated Ca2+ release in conjunction with Ca2+ entry from the extracellular environment. Ryanodine receptors on the other hand, appear not to play a role in this physiological mechanism.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.