Abstract
There is no known fundamental reason to demand as a cosmological initial condition that the bulk possess an SO(3,1) isometry. On the contrary, one expects bulk curvature terms that violate the SO(3,1) isometry at early epochs, leading to a violation of Lorentz invariance on our brane. Demanding that the Lorentz noninvariant terms are small leads to a new ``flatness'' problem, not solved by the usual formulation of inflation. Furthermore, unlike in four dimensions, the Lorentz violations induced from the bulk curvature cannot always be removed as the infrared cutoff is taken arbitrarily large. This means that the equivalence principle in higher dimensions does not guarantee the equivalence principle in dimensionally reduced theories. Near-future experiments are expected to severely constrain these Lorentz-violating ``signatures'' of extra dimensions.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
