Abstract

Non-traditional and informal economy workers often work outside the sphere of a formal employment relationship and are therefore by and large excluded from occupational injuries and disease protection. It is argued that innovative approaches, set within a principled and policy framework, need to be considered from a comparative perspective in order to extend this protection to these workers. These approaches refer to an appropriate definitional or conceptual widening of coverage; relevant human rights, international standards and standard-setting considerations; alternative institutional arrangements and appropriate regulatory responses; an increased role for governments and innovative funding options; and alternative prevention, rehabilitation/re-integration and compensation modalities. It is further argued that the South African occupational health and safety and workers compensation regimes could benefit richly from the comparative experiences and perspectives in this regard.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.