Abstract
The African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights has a uniquely broad subject-matter jurisdiction that includes any 'relevant human rights instrument ratified by the states concerned' (article 3 of the Protocol to the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights on the Establishment of an African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights). This article considers the extent to which the Court's subject-matter jurisdiction includes international humanitarian law, and the related issue of the Court's interpretive competence. It is argued that the Court indeed is competent to directly apply norms of international humanitarian law. However, the circumstances under which it can do so are limited to two instances, namely, (i) where international humanitarian law norms are incorporated by reference into applicable human rights treaties; and (ii) in the likely scenario that the Court regards some international humanitarian law conventions as having a human rights character, the primary rules of the applicable international humanitarian law obligations must entail an individual right. Whether a given international humanitarian law obligation entails an individual right is to be determined on a case-by-case basis and, in any event, such instances will be rare. As a consequence of the limited circumstances under which the Court can directly apply international humanitarian law, determining the extent to which the Court can rely on the interpretation of international humanitarian law in applying human rights norms remains pertinent. In this regard it is argued that the Court can rely on international humanitarian law in the application of human rights norms on two bases. First, considering the complementary relationship the Court has with the African Commission, the Court can rely on the African Charter's interpretation clause (articles 60 and 61). Second, the Court has an implied power to interpret international humanitarian law in applying human rights treaties, as this power is necessary for the Court to discharge its mandate.
Highlights
The circumstances under which it can do so are limited to two instances, namely, (i) where international humanitarian law norms are incorporated by reference into applicable human rights treaties; and (ii) in the likely scenario that the Court
There is general agreement that international human rights law and international humanitarian law co-apply during situations of armed conflict, and that their co-application is such that at times international human rights law norms are applied in a modified manner so as to ensure their mutual consistency with international humanitarian law.[1]
If the power to have recourse to international humanitarian law is essential to the performance of the European Court’s mandate as a court of human rights, the same holds true of the African Court
Summary
There is general agreement that international human rights law and international humanitarian law co-apply during situations of armed conflict, and that their co-application is such that at times international human rights law norms are applied in a modified manner so as to ensure their mutual consistency with international humanitarian law.[1]. With the co-application of international humanitarian law.[3] as these mechanisms have a patently human rights mandate and usually a narrow subject-matter jurisdiction limited to their own treaty regimes, they have adopted different approaches in this regard. These approaches are informed by each mechanism’s defined competence and implied powers. The interpretive competence of the African Court with regard to international humanitarian law remains the subject of speculation and debate. The prevalence of armed conflict in Africa does not in and of itself inform the appropriateness or desirability of the African Court directly applying international humanitarian law instruments, but does speak to the
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary 
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
