Exposure to Prolonged Rupture of Membranes at Term Increases the Risk for Ventilatory Support in Uninfected Neonates.

Abstract

The effects of prolonged rupture of membranes (ROMs) on perinatal outcomes are still unclear, and it remains controversial for the management of those labors. This study aims to evaluate how the exposure of pregnant women to a prolonged ROM (≥ 24 hours) affects maternal and neonatal outcomes. This retrospective cohort study included singleton pregnant women at term delivering between January 2019 and March 2020 in a tertiary hospital. All relevant sociodemographic, pregnancy, and perinatal variables (maternal age, prepregnancy body mass index, labor, and delivery outcomes) were collected anonymously. Data were compared between the "ROM < 24 hours" and "ROM ≥ 24 hours" study groups. A total of 2,689 dyads were included in the study and divided according to their ROM-delivery time: ROM <24 hours (2,369 women, 88.1%), and ROM ≥ 24 hours (320 women, 11.9%). Maternal baseline characteristics were comparable except for the rate of nulliparous women, which was significantly higher among patients with ROM ≥ 24 hours. No significant differences were found regarding infectious neonatal outcomes. However, mechanical ventilation and continuous positive airway pressure were more common among neonates born after ROM ≥ 24 hours. The greater likelihood of neonatal respiratory distress was also confirmed among infants born to Group-B Streptococcus-negative women with ROM ≥ 24 hours (15 out of 267 neonates, 5.6% vs. 52 out of 1,529 with ROM < 24 hours, 3.4%, p = 0.04). According to the actual expectant policy, prolonged ROM is associated with an increased risk of respiratory support in noninfected neonates. Further investigations are required to explain such an association. · The management of women with prolonged rupture of membranes is controversial.. · The exposure of pregnant women to a prolonged rupture of membranes affects neonatal outcomes.. · Prolonged rupture of membranes is associated with an increased risk of respiratory support, in group-B Streptococcus-negative neonates..