Abstract
We investigate the conditions that will promote explosive volcanic activity on Venus. Conduit processes were simulated using a steady-state, isothermal, homogeneous flow model in tandem with a degassing model. The response of exit pressure, exit velocity, and degree of volatile exsolution was explored over a range of volatile concentrations (H2O and CO2), magma temperatures, vent altitudes, and conduit geometries relevant to the Venusian environment. We find that the addition of CO2 to an H2O-driven eruption increases the final pressure, velocity, and volume fraction gas. Increasing vent elevation leads to a greater degree of magma fragmentation, due to the decrease in the final pressure at the vent, resulting in a greater likelihood of explosive activity. Increasing the magmatic temperature generates higher final pressures, greater velocities, and lower final volume fraction gas values with a correspondingly lower chance of explosive volcanism. Cross-sectionally smaller, and/or deeper, conduits were more conducive to explosive activity. Model runs show that for an explosive eruption to occur at Scathach Fluctus, at Venus’ mean planetary radius (MPR), 4.5% H2O or 3% H2O with 3% CO2 (from a 25m radius conduit) would be required to initiate fragmentation; at Ma’at Mons (~9km above MPR) only ~2% H2O is required. A buoyant plume model was used to investigate plume behaviour. It was found that it was not possible to achieve a buoyant column from a 25m radius conduit at Scathach Fluctus, but a buoyant column reaching up to ~20km above the vent could be generated at Ma’at Mons with an H2O concentration of 4.7% (at 1300K) or a mixed volatile concentration of 3% H2O with 3% CO2 (at 1200K). We also estimate the flux of volcanic gases to the lower atmosphere of Venus, should explosive volcanism occur. Model results suggest explosive activity at Scathach Fluctus would result in an H2O flux of ~107kgs−1. Were Scathach Fluctus emplaced in a single event, our model suggests that it may have been emplaced in a period of ~15 days, supplying 1–2×104Mt H2O to the atmosphere locally. An eruption of this scale might increase local atmospheric H2O abundance by several ppm over an area large enough to be detectable by near-infrared nightside sounding using the 1.18µm spectral window such as that carried out by the Venus Express/VIRTIS spectrometer. Further interrogation of the VIRTIS dataset is recommended to search for ongoing volcanism on Venus.
Highlights
Edifice, and stress-induced surface deformation features known as coronae and novae (Head et al, 1992) thought to be associated with shallow magma bodies (McGovern and Solomon, 1998)
Establishing whether explosive volcanism occurs on Venus might yield further clues concerning subsurface conditions on Venus and would better inform our understanding of atmospheric processes such as the apparent SO2 variations detected by Pioneer Venus (Esposito, 1985), and later Venus Express (Marcq et al, 2012)
Pure H2O was modelled as the volatile phase (Conflow is not capable of simulating CO2) from a 5 km deep, 25 m radius conduit/vent under Venusian surface conditions at mean planetary radius (MPR) with magma of 1200 K temperature and a base pressure of 118.54 MPa
Summary
Edifice, and stress-induced surface deformation features known as coronae and novae (Head et al, 1992) thought to be associated with shallow magma bodies (McGovern and Solomon, 1998). One recent exception is a proposed pyroclastic deposit known as Scathach Fluctus, identified by Ghail and Wilson (2013) This pyroclastic interpretation was arrived at via a combination of radar characteristics, flow morphology, and flow interaction with other geomorphological features. Whether or not explosive volcanism results in a buoyant plume has been extensively described in previous work on eruption column physics (Sparks, 1986; Valentine and Wohletz, 1989; Wilson et al, 1978; Woods, 1988, 1995; and others). A case study by Robinson et al (1995) applied the same model to Ma’at Mons and suggested that explosive volcanism could have been responsible for the elevated atmospheric SO2 concentrations detected by Pioneer Venus (Esposito, 1985). Previous models only included H2O but on Venus CO2 may be of comparatively greater significance in terms of plume dynamics than on Earth when considering the potentially smaller concentration of magmatic H2O (see Section 1.3) making its inclusion an important innovation
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have