Abstract
Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) carries a high mortality rate of around 50% annually, with management traditionally involving medical and surgical approaches. This systematic review and meta-analysis compare robotic neurosurgery with conventional treatments for ICH. We adhered to PRISMA guidelines, analyzing data from MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL up to October 2023, including randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, and cohort studies. We evaluated outcomes such as operation time, drainage time, intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization, mortality, and complications. Of the 10 studies with 1187 participants (609 in robotic neurosurgery and 578 in conventional management), robotic neurosurgery was associated with significantly reduced operation times, drainage times, and hospitalization needs, though intraoperative blood loss and mortality rates showed no significant difference. Robotic neurosurgery also demonstrated a lower risk of rebleeding but similar safety profiles for other complications. Despite these advantages, significant heterogeneity and limited RCTs highlight the need for further research. Robotic neurosurgery appears beneficial in improving ICH management outcomes, warranting additional multicenter trials to confirm long-term efficacy and safety.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
