Abstract

Transport energy conservation research in urban transport systems dates back principally to the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries’ (OPEC) “Arab Oil Embargo” (1973–1974) and the Iranian revolution (1979), when global oil supplies became threatened and costs rose steeply. Two subsequent Gulf Wars (1991 and 2003) highlighted the dangerous geo-political dimensions of Middle-Eastern oil. In latter times, the urgency to reduce global CO2 output to avoid catastrophic climate change has achieved great prominence. How to reduce passenger transport energy use therefore remains an important goal, which this paper pursues in ten Swedish cities, based on five scenarios: (1) increasing the relatively low public transport (PT) seat occupancy in each Swedish city to average European levels (buses 35%, light rail 48%, metro 60% and suburban rail 35%); (2) doubling existing PT seat occupancy in each Swedish city; (3) increasing existing car occupancy in each Swedish city by 10%; (4) decreasing existing energy use per car vehicle kilometer by 15%; (5) increasing existing modal split for daily trips by non-motorized modes to 50% in each city. A sixth “best-case scenario” is also explored by simultaneously combining scenarios 2 to 5. The data used in the paper come from systematic empirical research on each of the ten Swedish cities. When applied individually, scenario 2 is the most successful for reducing passenger transport energy use, scenarios 1 and 4 are next in magnitude and produce approximately equal energy savings, followed by scenario 5, with scenario 3 being the least successful. The best-case, combined scenario could save 1183 million liters of gasoline equivalent in the ten cities, representing almost a 60% saving over their existing 2015 total private passenger transport energy use and equivalent to the combined 2015 total annual private transport energy use of Stockholm, Malmö and Jönköping. Such findings also have important positive implications for the de-carbonization of cities. The policy implications of these findings and the strategies for increasing public transport, walking and cycling, boosting car occupancy and decreasing vehicular fuel consumption in Swedish cities are discussed.

Highlights

  • These energy values are converted to liters of gasoline using a 34.69 MJ/liter conversion factor and the per capita energy saving in liters is shown for each city, as well as the total annual liters of gasoline equivalent that would be saved

  • Swedish city to bring them in line with typical figures of approximately 1.40 to 1.45 found in other cities, while reducing the fuel consumption of cars by 15% through improving their technology would save approximately 32 million more liters than increasing public transport seat occupancy to the average European level

  • This paper has provided a detailed insight into the transport energy conservation potential of six scenarios applied to ten Swedish cites using 2015 data

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ever since OPEC enacted what has been called the “Arab Oil Embargo” of 1973–1974, followed by the ousting of the Shah of Iran and the subsequent Iranian revolution of 1979, many countries have become increasingly concerned about how to reduce their consumption of fossil fuels and lower their dependence on, and vulnerability to, imports of oil from the Middle East [1,2]. Sustainability 2022, 14, 954 showed volatility of the geo-politics of oil and the lengths to which some nations will go to ensure their security of access to oil reserves This need to reduce consumption of fossil fuels is further highlighted by current global concerns about limiting carbon dioxide (CO2 )

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call