Abstract

Energy is the lifeblood of cities, and oil is the power that drives urban transport systems, with 98% of global transport still fossil-fuel based, and emissions from the transport sector set to double by mid-century. Combined with a predicted 2–3 billion more people living in cities by 2050, and other significant impacts of transport systems such as congestion, pollution, and the destruction of the public realm of cities by roads and car parks, the need to reform urban transport systems is urgent. Cities today are looking to a post-petroleum future because of the non-renewable nature of oil, and the global CO2 problem. This chapter provides detailed data on energy consumption patterns in private and public passenger transport in a global sample of 44 cities in the United States, Canada, Australia, and Europe; as well as Singapore and Hong Kong, as examples of two highly developed Asian cities. A selection of data collected in each city is provided for 1995 and 2005. The changes in per capita and per kilometer energy consumption rates for cars, buses, light rail/trams, metros, suburban rail, and ferry systems that occurred in these cities over this 10-year period are analyzed. Although there was a small overall decrease in both per capita energy use in private passenger transport and consumption per kilometer of travel, per capita private transport energy use remained over 20 times higher than public transport, and approximately 2.3 times higher per passenger kilometer. Some relationships between energy use in urban transport and other factors such as city densities, infrastructure, and mobility patterns are explored, and the policy implications of the data are discussed in terms of how best to reduce energy consumption in urban passenger transport systems. The huge untapped energy conservation potential of public transport in cities is revealed, and the energy efficiency benefits of urban rail modes is demonstrated.

Highlights

  • Personal road transport is not able to provide a high transport capacity because according to information [1] in each car moves on average 1.2-1.5 human

  • In the practice of transportation for describing of the needs urban passengers and for regular analyze the conditions of passenger transportation a category is named "passenger traffic" [2,3] is used, that is characterized by "intensity"

  • Data about the intensity of passenger traffic are used for choice the type of transport with necessary capacity and determine the number of vehicles are required for transportation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Personal road transport is not able to provide a high transport capacity because according to information [1] in each car moves on average 1.2-1.5 human. Data about the intensity of passenger traffic are used for choice the type of transport with necessary capacity and determine the number of vehicles are required for transportation. The current state of passenger traffic has the following disadvantages: - the absence of objective information in real time about the intensity of passenger traffic on the route that prevents the adoption of optimal decisions and leads to economic losses; ICCPT 2019: Current Problems of Transport. - the small nomenclature of vehicles of different capacity to more accurately cover the changing passenger traffic. This drawback in modern technical support of urban passenger transport vehicles is impossible to overcome, since the industry is not able to manufacture many types of buses of different capacity

Literature review
Algorithm of constructing a delivery plan of passengers on the route
Conclusions
Results and General
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call