Abstract
AbstractThis study identifies and characterizes a second polymorph (Poly‐II) of quinoline‐4‐carbaldoxime (HQ), isolated from an acetone‐acetonitrile mixture. Poly‐II was compared to the previously known Poly‐I using PXRD, DSC, IR, and Raman spectroscopy. Poly‐I forms a 1D supramolecular assembly, whereas Poly‐II exhibits a 2D assembly with additional hydrogen bonds. Hirshfeld surface analysis reveals the presence of different non‐covalent interactions in Poly‐I and Poly‐II, and atom‐in‐molecule (AIM) analysis identifies their strength. AIM analysis, along with Espinosa's relation, was used to calculate the strength of O─H···N and C─H···N interactions in Poly‐I and Poly‐II. The values are −30.0 and −6.17 kJ/mol for Poly‐I, whereas the values for Poly‐II are −36.18 and −3.66 kJ/mol. The plane wave periodic DFT calculations determined the lattice energies of Poly‐I and Poly‐II to be −1.52 and −1.53 eV, respectively, indicating that both polymorphs have comparable stability. The crystal parameters of Poly‐I and Poly‐II obtained from theoretical simulations and the experiment are comparable, indicating the similar stability of Poly‐I and Poly‐II. Computational simulations confirmed experimental data, showing both polymorphs have similar stability and melting points despite different unit cell volumes.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call