Abstract

Recent advances in image description and matching allowed significant improvements in Visual Place Recognition (VPR). The wide variety of methods proposed so far and the increase of the interest in the field have rendered the problem of evaluating VPR methods an important task. As part of the localization process, VPR is a critical stage for many robotic applications and it is expected to perform reliably in any location of the operating environment. To design more reliable and effective localization systems this letter presents a generic evaluation framework based on the new Extended Precision performance metric for VPR. The proposed framework allows assessment of the upper and lower bounds of VPR performance and finds statistically significant performance differences between VPR methods. The proposed evaluation method is used to assess several state-of-the-art techniques with a variety of imaging conditions that an autonomous navigation system commonly encounters on long term runs. The results provide new insights into the behaviour of different VPR methods under varying conditions and help to decide which technique is more appropriate to the nature of the venture or the task assigned to an autonomous robot.

Highlights

  • V ISUAL place recognition (VPR) represents the ability of a robot to decide whether an image shows a previously visited place

  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) under Grants Extended Precision (EP)/R02572X/1 and EP/P017487/1 and in part by RICE Project funded by the National Centre for Nuclear Robotics (NCNR) Flexible Partnership Fund. (Corresponding author: Bruno Ferrarini.)

  • Visual place recognition (VPR) is an arduous endeavour in the field of robotic navigation, with the primary goal to accurately recognize a location from visual information

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

V ISUAL place recognition (VPR) represents the ability of a robot to decide whether an image shows a previously visited place. VPR techniques are often rated on their performance on different datasets, each having a different intensity of changing variables including illumination [34], [42], presence of dynamic objects [7], [55], viewpoint [19], [28] and seasonal variations [35], [38]. These factors yield changes in the appearance of places, which is the main reason for VPR remains a challenge in autonomous robotic navigation.

RELATED WORK
EVALUATION FRAMEWORK
Extended Precision Measure
Identification of the Upper and Lower Performance Bounds
Identification of Statistically Significant Performance Differences
RESULTS
Upper and Lower Performance Bounds Discussion
Statistical Performance Comparison
AUC as an Alternative to EP
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call