Abstract
Frequency selectivity—the ability of the auditory system to separate one stimulus out from others on the basis of frequency—originates in the cochlea where outer hair cells (OHCs) provide sharp mechanical tuning at low signal levels. Whether humans have sharper cochlear tuning compared to common laboratory species has been a matter of scientific debate. Whereas cochlear tuning can be measured directly in animal models, similar tests cannot be performed in humans due to their invasiveness. However, cochlear tuning can be gauged from measurements of other OHC-dependent phenomena, such as otoacoustic emissions (OAEs). Here, we compare frequency selectivity derived from stimulus-frequency (SF)OAE suppression tuning curves measured in both humans and chinchillas. SFOAE suppression tuning curves have previously been shown to be as sharply tuned as compound-action-potential tuning curves in chinchillas and behavioral tuning curves in humans (when using simultaneous masking). These earlier findings support the ideas that: (1) OAE tuning curves reflect aspects of cochlear tuning and (2) Sharp frequency selectivity is primarily established at the level of the cochlea. After correcting for interspecies differences in the apical-basal transition frequency and in cochlear lengths, we find that SFOAE tuning curves are twice as sharp in humans as in chinchillas.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.