Abstract
BackgroundFrequency selectivity (FS) is an important aspect of auditory function, and is typically described by a tuning curve function. Sharply tuned curves represent a higher acuity in detecting frequency differences, and conversely, broadly tuned curves demonstrate a lower acuity. One way of obtaining tuning curves is from techniques based on subjective behavioral responses, which yields psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs). In contrast, other methods rely on objective auditory responses to sound, such as neuron responses and otoacoustic emissions, amongst others. The present study introduces an objective method that uses stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) to assemble suppression tuning curves (STCs). Finding an objective method of accurately measuring human FS is very important, as it would permit the FS to be assayed in non-responsive patients (e.g., neonates or comatose patients). However, before the objective method can be applied, it must be demonstrated that its ability to estimate the FS, gives comparable results to those obtained by subjective procedures i.e. PTCs.MethodsSFOAEs responses, generated in the peripheral auditory system, were used to produce STCs. PTCs were measured by behavioral responses. The validity of the objective measures of human FS were determined by comparing stimulus frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves (SFOAE STCs) to PTCs at common stimulus parameters in 10 individuals with normal hearing, at low probe-tone levels.ResultsThe average Q10 ratios measured between PTCs and SFOAE STCs from subjects were close to 1 at various center frequencies (F2,24 = .15, p = .858). The estimates of FS provided by SFOAE STCs and PTCs were similar.ConclusionsThis system could be used to estimate auditory FS by both objective and subjective methods. SFOAE STCs have the potential to provide an objective estimate of auditory FS.
Highlights
Frequency selectivity (FS) is an important aspect of auditory function, and is typically described by a tuning curve function
The results in the faster Psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs) show the approximate V-shaped curve with a tail, which agrees with the results of
The results of subjectively measured PTC may be influenced by non-auditory factors, such as if the subject concentrated on the test and reacted rapidly
Summary
Frequency selectivity (FS) is an important aspect of auditory function, and is typically described by a tuning curve function. Before the objective method can be applied, it must be demonstrated that its ability to estimate the FS, gives comparable results to those obtained by subjective procedures i.e. PTCs. Frequency selectivity (FS) refers to the ability of the auditory system to identify tonal components in complex sound [1]. Frequency selectivity (FS) refers to the ability of the auditory system to identify tonal components in complex sound [1] It largely depends on the filtering ability of the cochlea [2], and its tuning properties are determined by the amplification mechanisms of the cochlear outer hair cells (OHCs) at low stimulus levels [3,4,5]. Despite this time-efficient way of obtaining PTCs, their interpretation is influenced by non-auditory factors such as attention [25], it cannot be used for difficult-to-test populations (e.g., age < 3 years, especially neonates)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
