Explore Xueshuan Xinmaining tablet effecting on treatment outcome of coronary heart disease based on propensity score

Abstract

Xueshuan Xinmaining tablet is a Chinese patent medicine for treating chest pain caused by blood stasis. It is widely used in clinical prevention and treatment of coronary heart disease. In order to understand the treatment effect of Xueshuan Xinmaining tablet in patients with coronary heart disease, we extracted electronic medical record data from 18 large hospitals nationwide. We matched the coronary artery disease patients with or without Xueshuan Xinmaining tablet treatment on gender, age, condition at admission and whether combined with cardiac insufficiency on a one to one ratio. After matching, both groups, patients using Xueshuan Xinmaining tablet (group A) and patients not using Xueshuan Xinmaining tablet (group B), ended up with 1,122 people. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment, the endpoint of effective group was defined as "cure" and "better" while the endpoint of invalid group was defined as "invalid" and "death". Chi-square test showed a statistical significant difference (P < 0.05) between the two groups of patients with coronary heart disease, with a higher efficiency in Xueshuan Xinmaining group. Classic logistic regression analysis showed no statistical significant difference between the two groups on treatment outcome efficiency. Generalized boosted models (GBM) and propensity score (PS) weighted Logistic regression were then applied to balance 45 variables between the two groups. The results showed a regression coefficient greater than 0 and a statistical significant difference (P < 0.05) between the two groups. Based on the existing results of the analysis, we considered that coronary heart disease patients using Xueshuan Xinmaining tablet had a higher efficiency in clinical efficiency than the patients not using Xueshuan Xinmaining tablet. Since this study did not certainly eliminate all the possible confounders and patients from the hospitals included in this study were not yet well represent the overall situation of the source population, the study conclusion only provided drug use reference for clinical doctors for coronary heart disease. Large randomized controlled trials needs to be done for more reliable results to guide clinical rational and effective medication.