Abstract
There is an urgent need to quantify the impacts of artisanal fisheries and define management practices that allow for the recovery and conservation of exploited stocks. The extent of illegal catch is particularly critical as a driver of overexploitation in artisanal fisheries. However, the lack of data at proper spatial scales limits the evaluation of illegal fishing and effectiveness of management practices. We used a catch curve analysis to estimate total instantaneous mortality as a proxy of fishing pressure in the artisanal benthic fishery in central Chile. We compared the patterns of total mortality in fishing grounds under the well-studied territorial use rights for fisheries system (TURF) immersed in a landscape of open access areas (OAA; no access restriction), and from these patterns determined the extent of illegal fishing in open access areas focusing on the two most frequently extracted resources: locos (Concholepas concholepas) and keyhole limpets (Fissurella spp.). The beauty of this seascape is the presence of the no-take (NT) area of Las Cruces as control (no fishing), allowing us to estimate natural mortality. Loco exploitation is banned in OAAs. However, loco mortality in OAAs was 92% higher than in the NT, and 42% higher than in TURFs. Keyhole limpet mortality was similar between TURFs and the NT, but doubled in OAAs. We also found strong differences in mortality among fishing grounds with the same level of protection (i.e. TURFs), and over time. Our results highlight (a) the high level of illegal fishing that may occur in artisanal fisheries under traditional management regimes, and (b) that TURFs can be effective to reduce fishing mortality. However, large variability among TURFs suggests the need for a deeper understanding of the drivers of success of TURFs.
Highlights
The artisanal benthic fishery is characterized by a territorial use rights for fisheries system (TURF) system that was experimentally established in the early 90s, representing a pioneering management strategy [24,28] that is spreading to several fisheries in Latin America and the world [5,21,29,30]
The highest mortality for keyhole limpets was estimated in open access areas (OAA) (Z = 0.78), followed by management areas (MAs) (Z = 0.49) and the NT from Las Cruces (Z = 0.48)
Catch curves, along with other data-limited assessment methods, are potential tools for studying the large number of unassessed, data-poor fisheries around the world and providing valuable information for fisheries management [62,63,64,65]. We used this classical but simple approach to infer illegal fishing. None of these alternative approaches substitute the urgent need for formal direct assessment of artisanal fisheries worldwide, or more powerful methods to determine illegal fishing, when data become available
Summary
The remaining 80% of the world fisheries, which are unassessed, is of major concern since recent studies suggest that 64% of them are overexploited and 18% are collapsed [3]. Most artisanal fisheries are data-poor and formal, traditional stock assessments cannot be applied to understand and regulate fishing effort. Advances in determining the condition of unassessed stocks (and small-scale fisheries), the impact of alternative management strategies, and the major drivers of overexploitation are becoming increasingly urgent
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
