Abstract
The article is devoted to the problem of the impossibility of constructing criminal procedural relations in a judicial interrogation of an expert. In the judicial interrogation of an expert, there is a subjective right of authorized persons to ask questions to an expert (to interrogate an expert) and a subjective right of an expert to answer questions (to testify). Forensic interrogation of an expert can be replaced by an expert’s explanation, which involves communication between the expert and the participants in the judicial investigation in the form of a dialogue.
Full Text
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call