Abstract
Following the 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the terms “Westsplaining” and “Westsplainer” gained momentum. They are used as a reaction to commentaries that are delivered by established Western intellectuals who lack proper knowledge of the region. Many people from Central and Eastern Europe, as well as some of their Western colleagues, tend to find such commentaries not only useless but also harmful. Far from being a purely theoretical academic contemplation, this type of commentary uses influential Western media forums to provide policy advice that is often based on false assumptions and projections. At the same time, some Westerners may feel wronged here, as the term “Westsplaining” could sound as a strong attempt to deny them the right to participate in expert debate based solely on their personal background. Without claiming a monopoly on the definition, the author attempts to explain why the term makes sense and how it can be used critically without being reduced to a vulgar ad hominem.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
