Explaining International Trends in Mortality on Hemodialysis Through Changes in Hemodialysis Practices in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS)

Abstract

Rationale & ObjectiveCase-mix adjusted hemodialysis mortality has decreased since 1998. Many factors that influence mortality may have contributed to this trend and these associations may differ by continental region. We studied changes in hemodialysis facility practices over time and their potential role in mediating changes in patient survival. Study DesignObservational prospective cohort study. Setting & ParticipantsAdult hemodialysis patients treated in hemodialysis 500 facilities participating in the Dialysis Outcomes Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) between 1999 and 2015 in the US, Japan, and 4 four European countries: Germany, Italy, Spain, and UK. PredictorsFour practice measures at each facility: the percentages of patients with Kt/V>1.2, interdialytic weight gain [IDWG]<5.7%, phosphorus<6 mg/dL, and using AV fistulae. OutcomesPatient survival. Analytical ApproachMediation analyses, adjusted for case mix, were conducted using 3-year study phase as the exposure and facility practice measures as potential mediators. ResultsIn Europe, we observed a 13% improvement in overall case-mix adjusted survival per decade. Trends in facility practice measures, especially Kt/V and phosphorus, explained 10% improvement in case-mix survival per decade, representing 77% (10% explained of 13% improvement) of the observed improvement. In Japan, 73% of the observed 12%/decade improvement in case-mix adjusted survival could be attributed to facility practices, especially Kt/V and IDWG. In the US, 56% of the observed 47%/decade improvement in case-mix adjusted survival could be attributed to facility practices, especially AV fistula use and phosphorus control. LimitationsUnmeasured changes in the characteristics of the patient population over this period may confound the observed associations. ConclusionThe improvements in adjusted hemodialysis patient survival in Europe, Japan, and the US from 1999 to 2015 can be largely explained by improvements in specific facility practices. Future changes in patient survival may be responsive to further evolution in the implementation of common clinical practices.