Abstract

‘Exceptional fossils’ of dinosaurs preserving feathers have radically changed the way we view their paleobiology and the evolution of birds. Understanding how such soft tissues preserve is imperative to accurately interpreting the morphology of fossil feathers. Experimental taphonomy has been integral to such investigations. One such experiment used a printing press to mimic compaction, done subaerially and without sediment burial, and concluded that the leaking of bodily fluid could lead to the clumping of feathers by causing barbs to stick together such that they superficially resemble simpler, less derived, filamentous structures. Here we use a novel, custom-built experimental setup to more accurately mimic subaqueous burial and compaction under low-energy, fine-grain depositional environments applicable to the taphonomic settings most plumage-preserving ‘exceptional fossils’ are found in. We find that when submerged and subsequently buried and compacted, feathers do not clump together and they maintain their original arrangement. Submersion in fluid in and of itself does not lead to clumping of barbs; this would only occur upon pulling feathers out from water into air. Furthermore, sediment encases the feathers, fixing them in place during compaction. Thus, feather clumping that leads to erroneously plesiomorphic morphological interpretations may not be a taphonomic factor of concern when examining fossil feathers. Our current methodology is amenable to further improvements that will continue to more accurately mimic subaqueous burial and compaction, allowing for various hypothesis testing.

Highlights

  • ‘Exceptional fossils’ of feathered dinosaurs, those discovered over the last two and a half decades, have radically changed our views of bird and feather evolution

  • We doubt whether inducing the escape of bodily fluid using a printing press is an accurate simulation of the burial and compaction experienced by exceptional fossils preserving plumage, which are often found in lowenergy, fine-grain, aquatic depositional settings (Norell and Xu 2005)

  • Attempts to mimic the taphonomic compaction of plumage used unrealistic simulations, leading to feathers clumping to resemble simpler, more plesiomorphic morphologies

Read more

Summary

Introduction

‘Exceptional fossils’ of feathered dinosaurs, those discovered over the last two and a half decades, have radically changed our views of bird and feather evolution. The bodily fluids that leaked out caused feather barbs to clump together, superficially resembling simpler, filamentous structures that lack the high-order branching seen in many modern feathers. Such taphonomic clumping as a result of compaction might lead relatively morphologically. Accurate morphological descriptions of fossil feathers are important given that some morphotypes appear to differ from those observed in modern feathers or predicted from an evo–devo model (Zhang et al 2008; Xu et al 2009; O’Connor et al 2012) Some of these morphotypes, such as those that appear to show thick, fused, ribbon-like regions, were suggested to be a taphonomic artefacts of this feather barb clumping (Foth 2012). We do not attempt to precisely mimic all of the physicochemical burial conditions of any particular fossil locality, but rather attempt to examine subaqueous burial and compaction more generally

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call