Abstract

Hydraulic fracturing is commonly used to enhance the hydraulic conductivity of geothermal, oil, and gas reservoirs, particularly those situated in enclosed and unconventional formations. Shale oil and gas reservoirs exhibit distinct characteristics in rock mechanics parameters, morphology, natural fracture geometry, and geological features. Structural anisotropy in materials generally arises from changes in grain type and size, weak layering, and variations in layering angles. This study aims to investigate the impact of two key factors, namely cyclic injection and structural anisotropy, on the hydraulic fracturing process. To achieve this goal, the phenomenon of hydraulic fatigue in rock was examined through various cyclic injection methods, and true-triaxial hydraulic fracturing tests were conducted on cubic samples composed of different materials and layers. To evaluate and analyze the fracture morphology of these samples, CT scan X-ray imaging technology was employed. The results revealed that samples subjected to cyclic injection exhibited an average breakdown pressure approximately 30% lower than those subjected to monotonic injection. Fracture geometry in the cyclic injection samples displayed a network pattern with multiple crack branches, while monotonic injection primarily resulted in a single-surface pattern. In samples with differences in horizontal stress, the anisotropy of the sample did not affect the fracture, and the single fracture surface extended in the direction of maximum stress. The energy generated by cyclic injection using the damage-controlled method (cycle duration: 16 s) was concentrated around the borehole, creating a complex fracture network with shorter crack lengths. Conversely, cyclic injection using the ramp signals method (cycle duration: eight seconds) produced more straightforward cracks with greater expansion and penetration. Examination of CT scan images of the fractured samples revealed average tortuosity and fracture volume fraction parameters of 1.117 and 0.027 for cyclic injection, respectively, in contrast to 1.026 and 0.008 for monotonic injection. Furthermore, the S-N damage model based on the results of true-triaxial hydraulic fracturing was introduced to describe rock damage behavior and the concept of fatigue under cyclic loads.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call