Abstract

Under axial compression, the present article analyses and compares the behaviour of Plain Concrete filled and Nano Silica modified concrete filled with light gauge steel rectangular columns. In 18 work samples, plain and nano silica-modified concrete was tested on light gauge steel sections. Investigations were conducted into several essential variables, including the geometry of the cross-section, the tubular thickness of light gauge steel, the depth-to-thickness ratio, and the type of concrete infill used. From the experimental results, effects of flat width-to-thickness ratio (w/t), axial load-end shortening, axial load-deflection, axial load-strain characteristics, and failure modes have been studied under the linear stage. To evaluate their confinement effects, this study compared plain and silica-modified nano concrete tube columns with light gauge steel hollow hollow hollow columns. The experimental results are compared using BS5400, EC4, and ACI codes to determine the ultimate sectional capacity. Test outcomes showed that tested nano-silica modified concrete filled steel tubular (CFST) columns exhibited higher strength and outstanding ductility than the plain CFST and hollow light gauge steel columns. The nano silica-modified concrete in-filled columns showed a good yield plateau under the non-linear stage compared with the other columns.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call