Experimental cyclic behavior and constitutive modeling of high strength structural steels

Abstract

High strength structural steels have recently achieved increasing application in civil and structural engineering worldwide. For instance, the sony center tower located in Berlin were constructed through steel truss made of S460 and S690 high strength steel whose nominal yield stress is 460 MPa and 690 MPa respectively. The utilization of high strength steel considerably reduced the structure deadweight and produced larger architecture space. Besides, steel connections of one military steel bridge in Mittådalenthe, Sweden were fabricated of 960 MPa ultra-high strength steel. This application remarkably increases the construction convenience since high strength steel presents excellent ability to reduce member size as well as improve structure performance. Nevertheless, limited test data have been available on the monotonic properties and cyclic behavior of these structural steels. In this study, uniaxial coupons were tested for four types of Chinese high strength structural steels, including grades Q460D, Q550D, Q690D as well as ultra-high strength structural steel Q890D, to investigate their stress-strain response and energy-dissipation behavior under monotonic and various cyclic strain demands. The monotonic test results of the tested steels were then compared with the requirements of current seismic design codes GB 50011-2010 and Eurocode8. Besides, cyclic strength, deformability and energy dissipation capacity were evaluated through the tested strain-stress loops. The experimental observations in cyclic tests show that cyclic softening, which significantly affects the shape of cyclic loops and energy dissipation capacity, is an important hysteretic characteristic for all tested high strength structural steels. Moreover, cyclic backbones of these four steels were calibrated using Ramberg-Osgood model. To fundamentally define the cyclic stress-strain relationship, essential parameters of three commonly used constitutive models, including Chaboche model, Dong-Shen model and Giuffre-Menegotto-Pinto model were calibrated based on the experimental data under cyclic loading. Those calibrated models were then employed in simulations of aforementioned cyclic loading tests and their validity were compared. Good agreements between experimental response and simulated performance by Dong-Shen model were achieved, demonstrating that the calibrated Dong-Shen model can elaborately describe the cyclic behavior of these four types of high strength structural steels.