Abstract

This study presents an experimental investigation and thermodynamic 0D modeling of the combustion of a compression-ignition engine, fueled by an alternative fuel based on neem biodiesel (B100) as well as conventional diesel (D100). The study highlights the effects of the engine load at 50%, 75% and 100% and the influence of the heat loss models proposed by Woschni, Eichelberg and Hohenberg on the variation in the cylinder pressure. The study shows that the heat loss through the cylinder wall is more pronounced during diffusion combustion regardless of the nature of the fuels tested and the load range required. The cylinder pressures when using B100 estimated at 89 bars are relatively higher than when using D100, about 3.3% greater under the same experimental conditions. It is also observed that the problem of the high pressure associated with the use of biodiesels in engines can be solved by optimizing the ignition delay. The net heat release rate remains roughly the same when using D100 and B100 at 100% load. At low loads, the D100 heat release rate is higher than B100. The investigation shows how wall heat losses are more pronounced in the diffusion combustion phase, relative to the premix phase, by presenting variations in the curves.

Highlights

  • Several published articles have reported on the sensitivity between biodiesel and engine load compared to conventional diesel fuel; these do not show the specificity of the impact of the load on the cylinder pressure, taking into account the heat loss through the cylinder wall and the type of fuel used

  • 3 shows the increase in theinexperimental cylinder pressure based based on theon the crankshaft angle when using similarity between crankshaft angle when using B100 and D100 at 100% load

  • The faster pressure increase in B100 biodiesel compared to diesel is Mohamed et al and Evangelos [20,21,27] made the same observation in similar studies

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Several published articles have reported on the sensitivity between biodiesel and engine load compared to conventional diesel fuel; these do not show the specificity of the impact of the load on the cylinder pressure, taking into account the heat loss through the cylinder wall and the type of fuel used. This reasearch proposes a comparative study of the cylinder pressures generated by the combustion of diesel and neem biodiesel. The heat release produced allows representing the phenomenology of the heat loss through the cylinder wall by dissociating the gross heat release rate from the net heat release rate during a combustion phase

Modeling of Zero-Dimensional Thermodynamic Combustion
Ignition Delay Model
Détermining the Heat Release Rate
15 Before TDC
Fuel Characteristics
Numerical Method
Experimental Evaluation of Cylinder
Comparison
Figures Pressure
Cylinder
Evaluation of Heat Release
3.4.1.Figures
3.4.2.Figures
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call