Abstract

A cyclic solvent injection (CSI) test is conducted in a large 3D physical model (80 × 40 × 20 cm3). 23.57 l heavy oil (2700 cp@21 °C) is saturated into this model. The test ran for 30 cycles achieving the recovery factor of 67.1%. Experimental results are compared with those of a cylindrical model (d = 15.24 cm, L = 30.48 cm) CSI test to investigate dominated driving mechanisms of CSI under different physical models. A linear form of material balance equation (MBE) of CSI is established for the first time to obtain the amount of diluted oil (Ndi) after the solvent injected into the model in each cycle, which could be used to evaluate the efficiency of oil dilution (Esd) and recovery factor of diluted oil (Rd). Esd is defined as the ratio of the Ndi to remaining oil. Rd is defined as the ratio of the cumulative oil production as per cycle to Ndi. In the MBE, since non-equilibrium phase behavior is presented in CSI, Rs and Bo measured by conventional PVT test under equilibrium state cannot be directly used in the MBE. In this study, Rs and Bo are first matched through the proposed MBE by using experimental data from large 3D test. With estimated Rs, Bo and other experimental data, Ndi of each cycle in large 3D test are obtained by liner regression. At last, to further verify the proposed MBE, the tuned Rs and Bo are used to obtain Ndi of the cylindrical model test.Comparison between two tests indicates that the gravity force still dominates the recovery factor rather than the model size. The model shape significantly affects the change of production rate, but not the average production which is mainly determined by the original oil in place (OOIP). The same behavior of minimum production pressure occurred in two tests with the same pressure decline rate. Ndi of each cycle in the large 3D test is successfully obtained through the established MBE. Then Ndi are used to obtain Esd and Rd. The results show that Esd first increases from 4.75% to 10.70% with the growth of solvent chamber. Then it keeps around 13.78% for main stage. During the very late stage, Esd decreases to 10.11%. Not as Esd dramatically varies, Rd in each cycle is in the range of 28%–34%, which indicates that recovery of CSI has much more potential. A higher recover factor could be expected if Esd and Rd would be both improved. By the tuned Rs and Bo in the large 3D case, Ndi of each cycle in the cylindrical model CSI test is matched with very good agreement (average R2 = 0.9899), which suggests that the established MBE is reliable to evaluate production performance of CSI.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call