Abstract

Abstract In this study, a sandpack model with porosity and permeability of 32.3% and 9.4 D, and a heavy crude oil with viscosity of 6430 mPa.s were used to represent a typical thin heavy oil formation. First, different ratios of C3H8 to CH4 stream were prepared and their performance on Cyclic Solvent Injection (CSI) method was examined to quantify the optimum solvent concentration. Second, CO2 was introduced to the optimum quantified CH4-C3H8 mixture to investigate the extent to which CSI behavior changes by partially replacement of CH4 with CO2. Results showed that ultimate oil recovery factor (RF) increased from 24.3% to 33.4% original oil in place (OOIP) when C3H8 concentration increased from 15 to 50 mol% in the CH4 stream. CSI tests with higher C3H8 concentration reached the maximum cyclic recovery with lower number of injection cycles - due to higher solubility of C3H8 compared with CH4. Solvent utilization factor (SUF) data also confirmed this as lesser volume of solvent with higher C3H8 concentration was required to produce oil. Visual observations showed that the produced foamy oil lasted longer with higher concentration of C3H8 in the solvent (5 min for 15% C3H8 – 85% CH4 case versus 180 min for 50% C3H8 – 50% CH4 case). Upon addition of CO2 to the mixture, the solvent apparent solubility increased and foamy oil flow promoted. The highest cyclic C3H8-CH4 apparent solubility of 0.175 gr. solvent/100 gr. remaining oil jumped to 0.53 gr. solvent/100 gr. remaining oil when 35% mole fraction of CO2 replaced CH4. The highest ultimate oil RF of 44.11% OOIP was measured from eight cycle injection of 50% C3H8 – 15% CH4 – 35% CO2. This solvent also benefited from the longest stability of produced-oil foamy shape with recorded time of 217 min (including production time). According to the results of this experimental study, it seems that there is an optimum fraction of C3H8 in CH4 stream injection in heavy oil systems (with viscosity in the vicinity of 6430 mPa s); the concentration beyond which ultimate oil recovery factor does not increase significantly (near 50 mol%). It is speculated that last cycles do not appreciably respond to heavy oil production mainly due to asphaltene getting precipitated within the model.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.