Abstract

The present work expands the application of Puck and Schürmann Inter-Fiber Fracture criterion to fiber reinforced thermoplastic 3D-printed composite materials. The effect of the ratio between the transverse compressive strength and the in-plane shear strength is discussed and a new transition point between the fracture conditions under compressive loading is proposed. The recommended values of the inclination parameters, as well as their effects on the proposed method, are also discussed. Failure envelopes are presented for different 3D-printed materials and also for traditional composite materials. The failure envelopes obtained here are compared to those provided by the original Puck and Schürmann criterion and to those provided by Gu and Chen. The differences between them are analyzed with the support of geometrical techniques and also statistical tools. It is demonstrated that the Expanded Puck and Schürmann is capable of providing more suitable failure envelopes for fiber reinforced thermoplastic 3D-printed composite materials in addition to traditional semi-brittle, brittle and intrinsically brittle composite materials.

Highlights

  • Traditional composite materials, in particular continuous fiber reinforced plastics, are able to provide excellent mechanical properties in addition to a large potential for optimization [1,2,3,4].A traditional composite manufacturing challenge, is inclusion of the reinforcing fibers into the polymer matrix with good consolidation, control of fiber orientation and low cost [5]

  • In order to demonstrate that the Expanded Puck and Schürmann can still be applied for traditional composite materials, failure envelopes are presented for traditional semi-brittle, brittle and intrinsically brittle composite materials

  • It can be verified that the Expanded Puck and Schürmann provided smooth and continuous failure envelopes when compared to the Original Puck and Schürmann a slight difference between the failure envelopes could be observed, mostly for the reinforced 3D-printed materials

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Traditional composite materials, in particular continuous fiber reinforced plastics, are able to provide excellent mechanical properties in addition to a large potential for optimization [1,2,3,4]. Its application is very practical for the industry, in preliminary design, and in critical and final design reviews since it is able to provide results for the stress level resulting in crack initiation and fracture as well as indicating the direction of cracks, mostly requiring simple analytical calculations after stress field computations It contributes to a more accurate design of laminated composite parts and saves computational time and cost. There are many qualities and advantages, a limitation of the Puck and Schürmann failure criterion is that it was initially developed for intrinsically brittle materials It means that its application in predicting the failure envelopes for some types of fiber reinforced thermoplastic materials may require adjustments on its specific parameters. Puck and Schürmann failure criterion to 3D-printed continuous fiber reinforced thermoplastics still remains a gap in the literature

Objective and Contribution
Puck and Schürmann Inter-Fiber Fracture Criterion
Preliminary Inspection for Intrinsically Brittle Materials
Applying Original Puck and Schürmann Inter-Fiber Fracture Criterion
Expanded Puck and Schürmann Inter-Fiber Fracture Criterion for 3D-Printed
Summary of the Failure Conditions and Respective Equations
Failure Envelopes for 3D-Printed Materials
Unreinforced 3D-Printed Material
Failure Envelopes for Traditional Composite Materials
Traditional Semi-Brittle Materials
Traditional Brittle Materials
Traditional Intrinsically Brittle Materials
Findings
Discussion
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call