Abstract

Consider the minimization of a possibly noncoercive Gâteaux differentiable functional F:X→ R . A modified notion of coercivity is introduced which may be usable to show existence of a minimum. Alternatively, F ̂ :D→ R has a minimum at yε D ( F ̂ not differentiable but the restriction F of F ̂ to X ⊂ D differentiable), one may be able to show y ̄ is actually in X . The latter case is related to justification of formally calculated “necessary conditions” for optimal controls. The arguments are applications of Ekeland's “approximate variational principle” ( J. Math. Anal. Appl. 47 (1974) , 324–353).

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.