Abstract

Simulations of two incineration processes, with and without flue gas recirculation, have been carried out performing an exergy analysis to investigate the most critical equipment unit in terms of second-law efficiency. Flue gas from the economizer outlet is employed to partially replace secondary combustion air to reduce, at the same time, incinerator temperature and oxygen concentration. Conversely, in the proposed configuration, the recirculated flue gas flow rate is used to control incinerator temperature, while the air flow rate is used to control the oxygen content of the fumes, leaving the incinerator as close to 6% as possible—i.e., the minimum allowed for existing plants to ensure completion of the combustion reactions and according to environmental regulations—and determines the corresponding minimum flue gas flow rate. The flue gas recirculation guarantees a larger level of energy recovery (up to +3%) and, at the same time, lower investment costs for the lower flow rate of fumes actually emitted if compared to the plant configuration without flue gas recirculation. Various operating parameters were varied (incinerator’s effluent gas temperature, air flowrate and flue gas recirculation flowrate) to investigate their influence on process exergy efficiency. Exergy analysis allowed the individuation of the equipment units characterized by larger exergy destruction and demonstrated that the flue gas recirculation led to an overall process exergy efficiency increase of about 3%.

Highlights

  • The quick population growth and high raw materials consumption are leading to a substantial increase in the municipal solid waste (MSW) produced worldwide, which has a remarkable negative impact on life quality [1]

  • MSW incineration, among other possible waste treatment processes, represents a well-known technology that can allow waste to be transformed into mechanical power, according to the waste to energy (WtE) approach [2]

  • The H-105 was characterized by lower exergy efficiency because the heat transfer occurred with two mixed fluids entering the unit, streams 117 and 126, where stream 117 was characterized by a pressure of 0.081 bar and a low physical exergy with respect to that of streams 126 and outlet stream

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The quick population growth and high raw materials consumption are leading to a substantial increase in the municipal solid waste (MSW) produced worldwide, which has a remarkable negative impact on life quality [1]. Despite the notable advantages of MSW incineration, some disadvantages have still reduced the overall efficiency and limited the environmental benefits of this process: by-product production (bottom and fly ashes, on which intensive research on their reuse is currently ongoing [5]), combustion instabilities, toxic gaseous pollutants and heavy metals emissions [6].

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call