Abstract

Differences in the visual processing of familiar and unfamiliar faces have prompted considerable interest in face learning, the process by which unfamiliar faces become familiar. Previous work indicates that face learning is determined in part by exposure duration; unsurprisingly, viewing faces for longer affords superior performance on subsequent recognition tests. However, there has been further speculation that exemplar variation, experience of different exemplars of the same facial identity, contributes to face learning independently of viewing time. Several leading accounts of face learning, including the averaging and pictorial coding models, predict an exemplar variation advantage. Nevertheless, the exemplar variation hypothesis currently lacks empirical support. The present study therefore sought to test this prediction by comparing the effects of unique exemplar face learning—a condition rich in exemplar variation—and repeated exemplar face learning—a condition that equates viewing time, but constrains exemplar variation. Crucially, observers who received unique exemplar learning displayed better recognition of novel exemplars of the learned identities at test, than observers in the repeated exemplar condition. These results have important theoretical and substantive implications for models of face learning and for approaches to face training in applied contexts.

Highlights

  • Familiar and unfamiliar faces engage different types of visual processing (Burton & Jenkins, 2011; Hancock, Bruce, & Burton, 2000; Jenkins & Burton, 2011; Megreya & Burton, 2006)

  • The present study compared the effects of unique exemplar face learning – a condition rich in exemplar variation – and repeated exemplar face learning – a condition that equates viewing time, but constrains exemplar variation

  • As the faces became more familiar, both groups found it easier to recognise the commonalities across different exemplars and their identity estimates became progressively more accurate

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Familiar and unfamiliar faces engage different types of visual processing (Burton & Jenkins, 2011; Hancock, Bruce, & Burton, 2000; Jenkins & Burton, 2011; Megreya & Burton, 2006). Perhaps the most striking difference between familiar and unfamiliar face perception is the ease with which we can recognise new exemplars. In contrast to the effortless recognition of celebrities, colleagues and friends, matching the faces of strangers across different photographic images can be remarkably difficult (Bruce et al, 1999; White, Kemp, Jenkins, Matheson, & Burton, 2014). When asked to sort photographs of two individuals according to the identity of those depicted, observers perform poorly, frequently attributing the photographs to eight or more different individuals (Jenkins, White, Van Montfort, & Burton, 2011)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call