Abstract
The paper intends to explore three archetypes of possible interaction between the agent and the social space in which one's own action is located. In this article, we will talk about modalities endowed with normative significance, that is focused around universal scopes and extra-contextual validities (values). Special attention will be paid to the dimension of the “intersection of social spaces” (the scheme assumes both the permanent dimension of “acting within spaces” and the dynamic dimension of “passing beyond them”), the modalities of exclusion, transition, and recognition are thus presented. Their action is complicated by alternative intersection paths in introdynamic and extradynamic dimensions. The study proposes to represent these modalities in order to further offer scenarios for the development and change of urban social spaces.
 Finally, the paper intends to propose a phenomenological interpretation of their possible interaction with reference to some ways of transforming urban spaces, which are typical of the European context.
Highlights
The paper intends to explore three archetypes of possible interaction between the agent and the social space in which one's own action is located
We will talk about modalities endowed with normative significance, that is focused around universal scopes and extra-contextual validities
Special attention will be paid to the dimension of the “intersection of social spaces”, the modalities of exclusion, transition, and recognition are presented
Summary
Городское пространство; городские общины; городское планирование; городская философская антропология; внеконтекстуальные обоснования; отчуждение; транзитивность; признание; пересечение; трансформация городского пространства. When we talk about urban philosophical anthropology we are alluding to a context in which an agent has to deal with an urban social space, whatever we stipulatively decide to define it. The simplest and the phenomenologically reduced situation contemplates two concepts: the concept of agent – a person who can spend time in a specific space, by performing certain actions, and, correlatively, the concept of a context that gathers such actions, namely, the urban social space itself. The second concept, urban social space, is a provisional term that I would like to introduce here. The normative challenge related to the interplay between agent and urban social space can start becoming clear. I’m proposing to consider and analyze here “archetypes” that have a universal, anthropological validity
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary 
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call