EXCHANGE RATE SENSITIVITY OF AUSTRALIA'S TRADE FLOWS: EVIDENCE FROM INDUSTRY DATA*

Abstract

In an effort to boost employment, a country could stimulate its exports and discourage its imports and thereby improve its trade balance. One policy that has received a great deal of attention in the literature is currency devaluation. By making exports cheaper and imports expensive, devaluation is said to improve the trade balance. The only condition required is that the sum of import and export demand price elasticities exceed unity (that condition, known as the Marshall-Lerner condition, is derived under the assumption of perfectly elastic supply of trade). Most previous studies that attempted to assess the Marshall-Lerner condition relied on price elasticities that were obtained by estimating aggregate import and export demand functions. These studies provided mixed conclusions as far as the effectiveness of devaluation or depreciation is concerned. Examples include Houthakker and Magee (1969), Khan (1974), Goldstein and Khan (1976, 1978), Wilson and Takacs (1979), Haynes and Stone (1983a, 1983b), Warner and Krienin (1983), Bahmani-Oskooee (1986, 1998), and Bahmani-Oskooee and Niroomand (1998). The mixed conclusion could be related to aggregation bias. When aggregate trade data are employed in import and export demand functions, significant price elasticity with one trading partner could be more than offset by an insignificant price elasticity with another trading partner, yielding an insignificant price elasticity. Because of aggregation bias, another body of the literature has emerged in recent years that concentrates on using trade data at the bilateral level. Examples in this latter group include Rose and Yellen (1989), Cushman (1987, 1990), Summary (1989), Marquez (1990), Haynes, Hutchison, and