Abstract

BackgroundRecent evidence links sedentary behaviour (or too much sitting) with poorer health outcomes; many adults accumulate the majority of their daily sitting time through occupational sitting and TV viewing. To further the development and targeting of evidence-based strategies there is a need for identification of the factors associated with higher levels of these behaviours. This study examined socio-demographic and health-related correlates of occupational sitting and of combined high levels of occupational sitting/TV viewing time amongst working adults.MethodsParticipants were attendees of the third wave (2011/12) of the Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle (AusDiab) study who worked full-time (≥35 h/week; n = 1,235; 38 % women; mean ± SD age 53 ± 7 years). Logistic and multinomial logistic regression analyses were conducted (separately for women and men) to assess cross-sectional associations of self-reported occupational sitting time (categorised as high/low based on the median) and also the combination of occupational sitting time/TV viewing time (high/low for each outcome), with a number of potential socio-demographic and health-related correlates.ResultsHigher levels of occupational sitting (>6 h/day) were associated with higher household income for both genders. Lower levels of occupational sitting were associated with being older (women only); and, for men only, having a blue collar occupation, having a technical/vocational educational attainment, and undertaking more leisure-time physical activity (LTPA). Attributes associated with high levels of both occupational sitting and TV viewing time included white collar occupation (men only), lower levels of LTPA (both genders), higher BMI (men), and higher energy consumption (women).ConclusionsHigher household income (both genders) and professional/managerial occupations (men only) were correlates of high occupational sitting time, relative to low occupational sitting time, while health-related factors (lower LTPA, higher BMI – men, and higher energy consumption – women) were associated with high levels of both occupational sitting and TV viewing time, relative to low occupational sitting and low TV viewing time. These findings suggest possible high-risk groups that may benefit from targeted interventions. Further research is needed on potentially modifiable environmental and social correlates of occupational sitting time, in order to inform workplace initiatives.

Highlights

  • Recent evidence links sedentary behaviour with poorer health outcomes; many adults accumulate the majority of their daily sitting time through occupational sitting and TV viewing

  • A higher proportion of men had a technical/vocational level of educational attainment (48 % vs 35 %) and more were in blue collar occupations (31 % vs 6 %)

  • Research on the correlates of occupational sedentary behaviour is still in its infancy, despite growing interest in workplace-based initiatives to address excessive sitting time. In this sample of full-time Australian workers, we observed variations between women and men in the attributes associated with high occupational sitting, and high occupational sitting and TV viewing time in combination

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Recent evidence links sedentary behaviour (or too much sitting) with poorer health outcomes; many adults accumulate the majority of their daily sitting time through occupational sitting and TV viewing. Studies have observed increased risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, some cancers, type 2 diabetes and the metabolic syndrome with higher levels of sedentary behaviour [1,2,3,4]. These detrimental associations have persisted in studies that have controlled for moderate-vigorous or leisure-time physical activity [3], suggesting the need for a dedicated public health focus on too much sitting. This, coupled with the increasing recognition of the adverse health impacts, has led some to propose that occupational sitting should be identified as a potential hazard and treated under work health and safety laws [9]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call