Abstract
Two sets of strain-controlled cyclic triaxial tests were conducted to investigate soil liquefaction of clean sands. The first set involved conventional uniform strain amplitude cyclic tests, while the second set examined non-uniform strain amplitude cyclic tests. Comparisons were made between the two sets of results with respect to the generation of excess pore pressure and relationship between strain amplitude and stress path. In the case of uniform strain-controlled cyclic tests, larger strain amplitude produced more rapid generation of excess pore pressure. Conversely, for non-uniform strain-controlled tests, larger strain amplitudes may generate lower excess pore pressure instead. Such counter-intuitive phenomenon has design implications if irregular earthquake loadings in the field are incorrectly represented as equivalent uniform loading in the laboratory. Details are described in this paper.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.