Abstract
The objective of this article is to review the arguments of the Roman lawyers of the 3rd century on the problems of delegatio and exceptio doli. The methodology is based on the analisis of fragments, excluding a textual-based critic. The results of the research show that the Roman lawyers of the last period of the classical jurisprudence preferred to strenghthen the position of the creditor, by limiting the extent of the exceptio doli when used by the debtor.
Highlights
The objective of this article is to review the arguments of the Roman lawyers of the 3rd century on the problems of delegatio and exceptio doli
The results of the research show that the Roman lawyers of the last period of the classical jurisprudence preferred to strenghthen the position of the creditor, by limiting the extent of the exceptio doli when used by the debtor
La prohibición del crédito para los hijos de familia y el dictado de la razón económica, en Seminarios Complutenses de Derecho Romano 6 (1994), pp. 157-181
Summary
Palermo), Michael Gagarin (Texas Univ.), Jean-François Gerkens Pavia), Thomas McGinn (Vanderbilt Univ.), Guido Melis
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
