Abstract

For implanted medical devices containing rechargeable batteries, maximizing battery lifetime is paramount as surgery is required for battery replacement. In non-life-sustaining applications (e.g., spinal cord stimulators or sacral nerve modulation), these implants may be left unused and unmaintained for extended periods, according to patient preference or in the case of unexpected life events. In this study, we examine the performance of two commercial lithium-ion cells intended for implantable neurostimulators (using lithium titanium oxide (LTO) and graphite as the negative electrode) when subjected to repeated deep overdischarge and to aging at a high state of charge (SOC). The graphite-based cells exhibited significant performance decline and swelling after overdischarge and became unable to store a charge after 42 days at 0 V. In contrast, the LTO-based cells exhibited minimal changes in performance even after 84 days (the length of the study) at 0 V. When subjected to an accelerated aging protocol at 100% SOC, the graphite-based cells were found to age more rapidly than the LTO cells, which exhibited minimal aging over the course of the study period. These results show that practical LTO-based lithium-ion cells are much more tolerant of abuse as a result of neglect and misuse and are worth considering for use in high-value applications where battery replacement is difficult or impossible.

Highlights

  • Rechargeable batteries for use in implanted medical devices face a unique set of constraints not encountered in most other applications

  • Tahteelmye2th60odduasyesdofof raccatlicvuelactyincglinDgCIfRoristhdeesLcrTibOedceinlls; the difAfeprpeenncdeixinA.tThheetdoatatal inuFmigubreer1orfepcyrecsleenst acphpireovxiemdarteelfyle2c5t4sdtahyes foafsatcetrivcehcayrcgliengrafoter tuhseed for LTgOrapcehliltse.cells and approximately 260 days of active cycling for the lithium titanium oxide (LTO) cells; the difference in the total number of cycles achieved reflects the faster charge rate used for LTO cells

  • In this work, we explored the performance of two different commercial lithium‐ion batteries intended for use in implanted medical applications; one used a traditional

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rechargeable batteries for use in implanted medical devices face a unique set of constraints not encountered in most other applications. Cell lifetime is paramount, as surgery is required to replace any defective or damaged batteries. This puts greater stress on designing cells that are exceptionally long-lived. In the case of non-life-saving applications, there is a significant likelihood that a patient may elect to leave a device unused for extended periods of time without maintaining or removing it. Cells need to tolerate potential extended storage at a high state of charge (SOC) as well as at a very low SOC (or even under overdischarge conditions)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call