Abstract
Mine explosions are caused by the ignition of excessive accumulations of combustible dust and/or flammable gas mixed with air in the presence of an ignition source. Rock dusting (limestone dust) is a primary measure to prevent propagating coal dust explosions in underground coal mines in the United States.Although rock dust is considered a nuisance dust, Continuous Personal Dust Monitors (CPDMs) do not distinguish between the coal dust and rock dust and assess the total dust exposure. During application, the <10 μm limestone particles and coal dust particles can become suspended and carried by the ventilating air for long distances and can be measured by the CPDMs. There is a concern in the mining industry that rock dust can be included in the CPDM measurements and make the samples noncompliant.Research conducted by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has found that all rock dust (RD) cakes after being wetted and then dried. To prevent rock dust from caking, several rock dust manufacturers have developed anti-caking rock dusts. The anti-caking additives used are typically fatty acids that make the rock dust hydrophobic and are added in very low quantities (<1%). While this development will add to the rock dust fluidity, an inevitable problem may be the increased airborne re-entrainment of rock dust due to vehicle movement and foot traffic in the area. Thus, one consideration to reduce such exposure from rock dust is to remove the respirable size fraction (<10 μm) of the applied rock dust. This paper presents the results of experiments that were conducted to determine if a rock dust can still inert a coal dust explosion when the respirable (<10 μm) or inhalable (<20 μm) component of the particle size distribution is removed. Three different untreated rock dusts (untreated A, B, and C) with their treated counterparts (treated A, B, and C) were classified using mechanical sieves into several different-sized fractions, including < 10, 10–20, 20–38, 38–53 and > 75 μm. The relative inerting effectiveness of these size fractions were determined using the United States Bureau of Mines (USBM) 20-L explosion chamber.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.