Abstract
Abstract The ABM deposit, Finlayson Lake district, Yukon, Canada, is a bimodal-felsic, replacement-style volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS) deposit (19.1 Mt @ 6.6 wt % Zn, 0.9 wt % Cu, 2.0 wt % Pb, 1.4 g/t Au, and 148 g/t Ag) hosted by Late Devonian continental back-arc–related volcanosedimentary rocks of the Kudz Ze Kayah formation. The VMS-related hydrothermal alteration associated with the deposit extends >1 km beyond the mineralization. Zones of pervasive sericite and chlorite alteration occur proximal to the massive sulfide lenses (<50 m) both in the hanging wall and the footwall, and zones of pervasive sericite and moderate sericite ± chlorite alteration extend laterally from the mineralization and into the hanging wall and footwall for hundreds to thousands of meters. Geochemical data and petrographic observations indicate that feldspar destruction and formation of white mica and chlorite were the main alteration processes. In both the hanging wall and footwall to the mineralization, base (e.g., Zn, Cu, Pb) and trace metals (e.g., Sb, Tl, Mo) form halos with elevated values up to 100 and 200 m, respectively. The paragenesis and the formation conditions of the hydrothermal alteration were determined through petrography of hydrothermal alteration assemblages and their crosscutting relationships, electron microprobe analyses of the compositions of white mica, chlorite, and carbonate, and illite-chlorite geothermometry. These data suggest that the sericite ± chlorite assemblage was the earliest and most extensive phase of the hydrothermal alteration that formed at temperatures around 215° ± 30°C. Overprinting the sericite-chlorite assemblage is the pervasive sericite assemblage that formed at temperatures around 250° ± 15°C. The pervasive chlorite assemblage formed at temperatures around 320° ± 10°C and overprints the preceding sericite-rich assemblages. Microprobe analyses of white mica and chlorite generally show that Mg-rich varieties are more common proximal to mineralization and formed earlier in the deposit paragenesis than Fe-rich varieties. Mineralogy derived from short-wave infrared data for mica and chlorite, however, shows no clear spatial trends across the deposit due to complex overprinting relationships between alteration minerals.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.