Abstract

A striking diversity of compound eye size and shape has evolved among insects. The number of ommatidia and their size are major determinants of the visual sensitivity and acuity of the compound eye. Each ommatidium is composed of eight photoreceptor cells that facilitate the discrimination of different colours via the expression of various light sensitive Rhodopsin proteins. It follows that variation in eye size, shape, and opsin composition is likely to directly influence vision. We analyzed variation in these three traits in D. melanogaster, D. simulans and D. mauritiana. We show that D. mauritiana generally has larger eyes than its sibling species, which is due to a combination of larger ommatidia and more ommatidia. In addition, intra- and inter-specific differences in eye size among D. simulans and D. melanogaster strains are mainly caused by variation in ommatidia number. By applying a geometric morphometrics approach to assess whether the formation of larger eyes influences other parts of the head capsule, we found that an increase in eye size is associated with a reduction in the adjacent face cuticle. Our shape analysis also demonstrates that D. mauritiana eyes are specifically enlarged in the dorsal region. Intriguingly, this dorsal enlargement is associated with enhanced expression of rhodopsin 3 in D. mauritiana. In summary, our data suggests that the morphology and functional properties of the compound eyes vary considerably within and among these closely related Drosophila species and may be part of coordinated morphological changes affecting the head capsule.

Highlights

  • Compound eyes are composed of subunits called ommatidia and the great diversity of eye sizes and shapes among insects [1] is mainly the result of evolutionary changes in either ommatidia number (1 in some ant workers to 30000 in dragonflies) or ommatidia diameter (5–50 mm) [1,2,3]

  • We found that the D. mauritiana strains TAM16 and MAV1 have larger eyes than all D. melanogaster and D. simulans strains surveyed (Figure 1B, Table S1; one-way ANOVA: F(17,597) = 168.37, p,0.0001)

  • We found that D. melanogaster M36 and OreR have the smallest eyes among the strains surveyed, the African strain of this species (Zi372) exhibits eye areas comparable to those of the D. simulans strains (Figure 1B, Table S1; D. melanogaster females of M36 and OreR are not significantly different)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Compound eyes are composed of subunits called ommatidia and the great diversity of eye sizes and shapes among insects [1] is mainly the result of evolutionary changes in either ommatidia number (1 in some ant workers to 30000 in dragonflies) or ommatidia diameter (5–50 mm) [1,2,3]. These two parameters significantly influence the optical properties of the compound eye. Dorsal-frontal locally restricted acute zones with large ommatidia and reduced interommatidial angles that produce increased resolution to optimise the pursuit and capturing of prey or mating partners have evolved in several insects [9,10,11,12,13]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call