Abstract
Nature and natural science are not supposed to jump, but scientists must sometimes travel in zigzag. The follow-up of the A-bomb survivors has been a huge, dedicated effort. The health studies have evolved with admirable continuity to become the primary basis of current knowledge on the late effects of ionising radiation. The one element of uncertainty, however, that has for several decades interfered with the straight evolution of the study has been related not to the medical aspects, but - perhaps surprisingly - to the seemingly plain issue of the physics of radiation and its impact on dose assessment and risk modelling.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
