Abstract

Languages spoken in contiguous areas tend to have similar systems of evidentiality marking. The Caucasus is part of a large area where systems centered on marking events as not witnessed by the speaker are widespread among genealogically unrelated languages. It is often suggested that Turkic languages could be the source of diffusion in this case, because evidentiality is an old and prominent feature of Turkic grammar. This paper explores the areal dimension of evidentiality in languages of the East Caucasian family, which are spoken on a relatively compact territory in the eastern Caucasus. It provides an overview of the most common types of marking and their geographical distribution among the East Caucasian languages and their Turkic neighbors. The spread of evidentiality as part of the tense system shows a peculiar pattern in the eastern Caucasus, which suggests that it could be a contact-induced feature. However, a number of factors prevent the reconstruction of a specific borrowing scenario. Based on the currently available data the Turkic contact hypothesis cannot be confirmed nor refuted. The paper proposes an alternative scenario for a mixed language-internal and contact-induced development that can possibly be verified with data from oral narratives.

Highlights

  • Evidentiality is usually defined as the encoding of information source

  • The aim of this paper is to explore the areal dimensions of evidentiality in the East Caucasian languages by comparing how the category is expressed in East Caucasian and neighboring languages, and plotting the distribution of features on a map

  • This paper focuses on a particular type of evidentiality marking in the East Caucasian languages and attempts to evaluate the likelihood that this feature emerged as the result of language contact with local Turkic languages

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Evidentiality is usually defined as the (grammatical) encoding of information source. The languages of the East Caucasian (or NakhDaghestanian) language family commonly feature a perfect tense that can function as a general indirect marker covering (among other things) inference from results and hearsay. The paper corroborates an earlier observation that perfects with an indirect evidential function are overall common in the family, but predominantly absent among languages spoken in the southern part of the area (Verhees 2018a). This pattern encompasses local Turkic languages, suggesting that we could be dealing with an areal phenomenon. This paper is based on my PhD research (Verhees 2019a) but contains a few updates, revisions and fine-tunes compared to the data and conclusions presented therein

The eastern Caucasus as a linguistic area
Formal aspects of East Caucasian perfects
Witnessed past
Perfect “series”
Other types of evidentiality marking
Evidential auxiliaries from lexical verbs
Evidential particles
Turkic languages
Map visualizations
Other languages of the area
Iranian
Armenian
Kartvelian
West Caucasian
Summary
The Turkic Hypothesis
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call