Abstract

Objective:This study investigated the contributions of library and information science (LIS) professionals to systematic reviews and meta-analyses with authors from Sub-Saharan Africa. It also investigated how the first author's address and type of collaboration affected the involvement of LIS professionals in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.Methods:Bibliographic data of systematic reviews with author(s) from the forty-six Sub-Saharan African countries was retrieved from MEDLINE. Content and bibliometric analyses were performed on the systematic reviews' full-texts and bibliographic data, respectively, to identify the contributions of LIS professionals and collaboration patterns.Results:Beyond traditional roles as search strategy developers and searchers, the LIS professionals participated in article retrieval, database selection, reference management, draft review, review conceptualization, manuscript writing, technical support, article screening and selection, data extraction, abstract review, and training/teaching. Of the 2,539 publications, LIS professionals were mentioned in 472 publications. LIS professionals from only seven of the forty-six Sub-Saharan African countries were noted to have contributed. LIS professionals from South Africa were mentioned most frequently—five times more than those from other Sub-Saharan African countries. LIS professionals from Sub-Saharan Africa mostly contributed to publications with first authors from Sub-Saharan Africa (90.20%) and intra-Sub-Saharan African collaboration (61.66%). Most LIS professionals (97.91%) that contributed to international collaboration publications were from outside Sub-Saharan Africa.Conclusion:The contribution of LIS professionals in Sub-Saharan Africa to evidence-based biomedical research can improve through training, mentoring, and collaboration between LIS associations in Sub-Saharan Africa and those in countries with resources and a history of research collaboration with the region.

Highlights

  • Health sciences library and information science (LIS) professionals provide many services, carry out different activities, and play various roles in the context of their work

  • LIS professionals were mentioned in 472 publications (417 systematic reviews and metaanalysis and 55 protocols)

  • Of the 472 systematic reviews and meta-analyses that mentioned the contribution of LIS professionals, addresses of the LIS professionals were not specified in 177 publications

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Health sciences library and information science (LIS) professionals provide many services, carry out different activities, and play various roles in the context of their work. Some of these activities and roles include liaison, informationist, data management, reference, research, and instruction. Boruff, and Gore found that LIS professionals contribute to systematic reviews and metaanalyses as expert searchers, methodologists, and information managers; their central roles in systematic reviews go beyond searching [4, 5] and include information management, formulation of review questions, development of search or information retrieval strategies, results collation, and report writing [5]. Harris [6] reported that librarians’ multiple roles as expert searchers, organizers, and analyzers form an integral part of the Cochrane Collaboration’s criteria for conducting systematic reviews

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call