Abstract
This is the protocol for a scoping review that aims to systematically explore and summarise the published evidence of violations of the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes (the Code) and subsequent World Health Assembly Resolutions globally. The planned scoping review will seek to identify what research has been conducted on the topic, examine the geographic spread and nature of violations, and summarise knowledge gaps. The Code was adopted in 1981 by the World Health Assembly to protect infant health, in particular from aggressive and inappropriate marketing of breastmilk substitutes including formula and related products. Non-compliance with the Code or violations are described in reports, however, no existing systematic review of the global research appears to have been conducted that encompasses the varied disciplines including health, economics, and gender. The review will inform international and national decision-makers on the nature of violations and potentially highlight the need for new modalities to regulate this marketing. The proposed scoping review will use the six-step process of Arksey and O’Malley which includes defining the research question; identifying the relevant literature; selecting studies; charting the data; collating, summarising and reporting the findings; and will include a consultative group.
Highlights
The proposed scoping review will use the method framework of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Collaboration [48] and will report in accordance with the guidance provided in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) [49]
No inputs from the consultative group will be published in any way that is individually identifiable. This is the protocol for a systematic scoping review
The review is strengthened by following a structured process with any amendments to this protocol described in the review and the reasons, and by the involvement of a consultative group
Summary
The format of a scoping review was chosen as the most appropriate method to explore a broad body of evidence, identify key concepts and themes, and clarify sources of evidence. A scoping review maps the evidence available in a systematic manner and supplies a knowledge synthesis including research gaps that may aid future research planning [44]. This is a rapid scoping review to be carried out over a period of 10 weeks as an element of a wider project. The six-step process of Arksey and O’Malley [50] will form the framework for the work, which includes to define the research question; identify relevant literature; select studies; chart the data; collate, summarise and report the findings; and include a consultative group
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.