Abstract

The increasing concern over bisphenol A (BPA) has directed much attention toward bisphenol F (BPF) and bisphenol S (BPS) as BPA alternatives for the development of “BPA-free” products. Consequently, BPS and BPF were frequently detected in surface water, sediment, sewage effluent, indoor dust, and even in food and biological fluids in humans. Thus, environmental researches start to focus on the potential environmental risks of BPA alternatives. While the estrogenically active metabolites and the specific estrogenically active structure are still unknown. In this study, the MTT assay on acute cytotoxicity and the recombinant transactivation assay were carried out to determine whether BPF and BPS are suitable alternatives to BPA. Our results show that the cytotoxic and estrogenic activities of BPS and BPF are lower than those of BPA. However, after the addition of a rat liver homogenate to simulate mammal metabolism, BPF exhibited higher estrogenic activity than BPA. To identify the chemical structures and estrogen receptor binding affinities of active estrogenic metabolites, LC-MS, MetaPrint2D(-React), and VirtualToxLab were integrated. The observed results indicated that the para-hydroxylated BPF and BPF-OCH3 might have strong ER binding affinities. These results demonstrate that metabolization is important to consider upon investigating endocrine disruption of chemicals getting into contact with humans, such as in dental sealing or food packaging. Alternatives to potentially hazardous substances should be thoroughly tested prior to use.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call